1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of some contents as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. The fourth to twenty parts of the decision of the court of first instance shall be as follows.

2) As to the above suspension order, the Defendant was rendered a favorable judgment against the Minister of Health and Welfare, by filing a lawsuit against the Minister of Health and Welfare to revoke the disposition of revocation of the order to suspend the performance of medical technology, which was rendered against the Defendant on February 22, 2012, to the effect that “the Minister of Health and Welfare revoked the order to suspend the performance of medical technology performed by the Defendant on March 3, 2011,” which was declared in favor of the said court on August 30, 2013, after filing an appeal against the Minister of Health and Welfare to revoke the disposition of revocation of the order to suspend the performance of medical technology performed by the Minister of Health and Welfare against the Defendant.”

The Minister of Health and Welfare appealed to the Supreme Court Decision 2013Du21120, and the final appeal of the above case is currently pending.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just as it is concluded, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.