The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (each crime committed at least No. 1 through No. 11 per annum of crime committed as indicated in the judgment below: Imprisonment with prison labor for two months, each crime committed at least No. 12 through No. 772 per annum of crime committed as indicated in the judgment below: imprisonment with prison labor for one year, 80 hours after order, 3 years of order of disclosure, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant recognized all the facts charged and reflects his mistake, and each crime committed at least 1 to 11 times a year in the list of crimes in the judgment of the court below is to be sentenced in consideration of equity with the case where the defendant is judged simultaneously with the crime of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes for which the judgment has become final, but the crime of this case is to be judged in consideration of equity with the case where the defendant committed the crime of this case, while the crime of this case is to be taken after the defendant determined the object of the crime and then the victim's behind the crime is not highly good in light of the method of crime, period of crime, shooting, etc., the defendant continued the crime of this case, one time of suspended sentence for the same crime, one time of fine, and the number of crimes committed, and in particular, the number of times again committed during the suspended sentence period due to the same crime reaches 600 times, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc., and circumstances after the defendant's argument is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.