logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.05.03 2017고단1672
도로교통법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On September 4, 2017, the Defendant violated the duty to provide personal information in front of the convenience stores in the Gu and America, around 11:50.

2. Article 254(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that “The entry of a public prosecutor’s office must specify the facts by specifying the date, time, place, and method of the crime.”

"........"

However, in the instant petition for adjudication, the facts charged were specified because the Defendant did not contain specific facts of action in the petition for adjudication.

shall not be deemed to exist.

Therefore, the prosecution procedure in this case is invalid in violation of Article 254 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow