1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 30,50,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from July 14, 2016 to the day of complete payment.

1. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6 Jaen 10, as to the cause of the claim, the defendant received cash of KRW 10,000,000 and KRW 10,000,000, down payment of KRW 2,000, and KRW 200,000, and the plaintiff recognized 20% interest in the total number of the sales tickets, and prepared cash receipts that compensate the plaintiff for 00,000, KRW 200,000 on September 4, 2010, and KRW 200, KRW 300,000, KRW 200 on September 6, 2010, and KRW 30,000 on September 24, 201, the plaintiff prepared a cash receipt of KRW 200, KRW 3000,000 on May 25, 201 (the plaintiff).

Each of the above facts, Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 5, which can be recognized by the purport of all the statements and arguments, are as follows. The plaintiff asserts that the remaining loans, other than the amount remitted to the defendant, were paid in cash, and the defendant's written reply (Evidence No. 5) dated April 26, 2011, the defendant also invested KRW 10 million in business around September 2010, and the defendant made efforts to promptly pay the plaintiff's money, and the defendant paid part of the interest on the above money to the plaintiff. The defendant is not a loan to the defendant, but a loan to the defendant, and the defendant has compensated for the proceeds. However, considering the above facts, the plaintiff does not clearly dispute that the amount stated in each cash receipt or cash storage certificate itself is false.