All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (i.e., imprisonment of 10 months for Defendant A, (ii) imprisonment of 8 months for Defendant B, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the period of the instant crime is relatively short, the lower court seems to have determined the sentence in full consideration of these circumstances. Furthermore, Defendant A had two times (one time of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor, one time of the fine), and one time (one time of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor), and Defendant B had several criminal records in addition to these criminal records. In particular, Defendant A had two criminal records in two times, and Defendant A had two criminal records. The instant crime was committed, which led to promoting a speculative spirit and hindering sound work, and is also detrimental to the society. In particular, the instant game head was operated closely to the extent that it could not be identified as a game place, and in full view of the external circumstances, the Defendant’s character and character, family environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too unfair, and thus, the Defendants’ assertion is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.