logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.02.17 2015가단209770
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) 1% per month from October 8, 2006 to March 30, 2015 for the Plaintiff, and the following:

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by considering the whole purport of the pleadings as a whole in the entries in Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, and Gap evidence 7:

1) Before December 1, 2005, the Plaintiff’s father C is the mother of D and E acting as the mother of D, and the Plaintiff’s father is the Plaintiff’s 3-Dong Building Construction Work (hereinafter “instant construction work”) with the size of 4 stories above 208-1 square meters above the Fluan-gu, Busan.

As to the contract for construction works (hereinafter “instant contract for construction works”) as follows:

A) Around that time, the Plaintiff entered into the construction contract and received payment of KRW 10 million. The construction period: December 1, 2005 on the date of the commencement; the date of the construction work on March 30, 2006: the payment method: KRW 188,200,000: the advance payment amount: KRW 10,000; KRW 25,000,000 at each time of completion of the first floor of the progress payment slab; and KRW 25,000,000 at each time of completion of the remainder of the construction project; and KRW 2) The Plaintiff’s father C requested D to ensure that the payment of the construction price of this case is clearly guaranteed to D after the construction contract of this case; on December 8, 2005, the Defendant, who is the husband and the husband of D, shall make the loan payment of KRW 100,000,000 to the Plaintiff on December 10, 2005 (hereinafter “the maximum amount of loan”).

B. As long as the authenticity of the judgment document is recognized, the court shall reasonably interpret the objective meaning given by the parties to the act of indicating in writing, regardless of the party’s internal intent, and if the objective meaning of the text is clear, it is obvious that the content of the statement can be denied.

arrow