beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) from August 29, 2014, the Plaintiff 15,00,000 won for each of the Plaintiff B and C and each of them.
Reasons
1. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) Plaintiff A married with Plaintiff B (199) and Plaintiff C (201) as his child in around 1997; (b) the fact that the Defendant entered into an illegal relationship between Plaintiff B and the Plaintiff C (2001) around 2008, by around 2014, and there is no dispute between the parties; and (c) according to Plaintiff B and C’s application for the Kakaka Kaka Kao’s friendship with Plaintiff C around 2014, the fact that the Defendant became aware of the unlawful relationship with the Defendant by viewing the pictures, etc. of the Defendant and D, which were occupied by the Defendant and D, located in the KaKaka Kao Sato.
2. The judgment-making third party shall not interfere with a married couple's community life falling under the essence of marriage, such as interfering with a couple's community life by causing a failure of a married couple's community life;
In principle, a third party's act of infringing on or interfering with a marital life falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with either side of the married couple and causing mental pain to the spouse by infringing on the rights of the spouse as the spouse.
(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 201Meu2997 Decided November 20, 2014). The Defendant, from around 2008, committed an unlawful act with D, the husband of the Plaintiff, thereby causing mental pain to the Plaintiff A.
In addition, the defendant applied for the friendship of the Kakao Kakao to the plaintiff C and caused the plaintiff B and C to become aware of the defendant's misconduct, the father of the above plaintiffs, and caused mental suffering to the above plaintiffs.
I would like to say.
Therefore, the defendant has a duty to pay for mental suffering suffered by the plaintiffs in money.
Therefore, considering the various circumstances shown in the arguments in this case, such as the marriage period, plaintiff B, C's age, D and the defendant's improper act period, the amount of consolation money shall be determined at KRW 15,00,000, and the plaintiff B and C as KRW 2,50,000, respectively.