logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2016.11.23 2015가단5644
분묘굴이등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, provided that there is no dispute between the parties or that there is evidence Nos. 1, 5, and No. 1, 2, and 3 (including each number, if there is a serial number).

On August 10, 2015, the Plaintiff purchased 1/3 shares out of C Forest land 43,240 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in Ansan-si, Dong-si (hereinafter “instant land”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 11, 2015.

B. On the ground (b) part 135 square meters (hereinafter “the part”) which connects each point of the separate sheet No. 74, 75, 76, 77, and 74 among the instant land, one grave (hereinafter “the instant grave”) of the Defendant’s lighting net E (hereinafter “the deceased”). The instant grave was installed around 1861, in which the deceased died.

C. The Defendant, as the son of the Deceased, currently manages and protects the instant grave as the son of the Deceased.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, unless there are other special circumstances, the defendant has a duty to excavate the grave of this case to the plaintiff who is the owner of the land of this case and to deliver the part to him.

B. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion 1) as to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant acquired the right to grave base by occupying the grave base in a peaceful and open manner for at least 20 years, and thus, is unable to comply with the Plaintiff’s claim. 2) A) In the event that a grave is installed on another’s land owned by another person without the owner’s permission, the Defendant shall obtain by prescription the right to grave base, which is a real right under the customary law similar to superficies, if possession of the grave base in a peaceful and open manner for twenty (20) years (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Da14036, Jun. 14, 1996). In light of the above fact-finding, the Defendant, as a son’s accessory hand, can be recognized as a fact of managing and defending it in a peaceful, openly and openly for at least twenty

arrow