logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.12.06 2012고단655
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the [Attachment 5] Nos. 5 and 6 shall apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant B was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on June 25, 2009 by the Busan District Court for violating the Illegal Check Control Act, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on August 10, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

D shall be for the same year at the Haman on January 201.

2. The Defendants, which came to know through the introduction of E, etc. known to the police officer from the first police officer, registered themselves as the representative director of F in the corporate register of the Defendants, opened the current account as the representative director of F in the company, and issued the current account to the Defendants in return for lending KRW 50 million in return for the loan of the current name, and the said company was aware of the fact that the current number of shares issued in the name of the said company as the “Puercom” would not be paid due to the shortage of deposits, etc., the said company received nine million won as the term “Puercom,” and opened the current account at the place of the Chungcheong branch of the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, which received from the Defendants on January 31, 2011. On February 22, 2011, the said company registered himself as the representative director of the said company, and received the current number of shares in the name of the said company, and offered them to the Defendants.

Therefore, Defendant B issued a check number “G”, face value “30,000,000 won”, and issuance date “the check was presented to a bank within the due date but did not receive payment as a disposition of suspension of transaction.” In collusion with D, the Defendants issued a check number of KRW 255,00,000 in total five times from that time until August 201, and issued a check number of KRW 1 to 4,000 in total, and each holder of the check presented payment to the bank within each due date, but did not receive payment as a disposition of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the first trial record;

1. 3 times;

arrow