1.(a)

Defendant D and E respectively are KRW 18,00,000, KRW 2000, KRW 300,000 and each of the above amounts to Plaintiff B and C.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) around 20:00 on August 29, 2013 to 22:00, Defendant D (at that time 12 years old) took the chest of the Plaintiff (at that time 13 years old), Defendant F (at that time 12 years old), and I (at that time 12 years old 12 years old 12 years old 12 years old 12), with the floor of hand, took part in the process of viewing the network in the vicinity of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and took part in the process of viewing the Plaintiff’s 12 years old 15 years old 15 years old 2), and Defendant D’s mother was forced to attract the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff’s parking lot, and Defendant D’s 13 years old Y’s sexual intercourse was caused by Defendant H’s treatment, Defendant H’s 3 years old son’s son’s sexual intercourse, and Defendant H’s son’s her mother to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, each entry and video of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 14, and the purport of whole pleading

B. We examine the judgment, the above assault and rape (hereinafter referred to as the "Rape of this case") and rape (hereinafter referred to as the "Rape of this case") constitute tort against the plaintiffs, and as a result, it can be said that the plaintiffs suffered emotional distress from the assault and rape of this case, Defendant F, I, K, and N as the perpetrator of the assault of this case and rape, and as the perpetrator of the assault of this case, Defendant G, H, L, M,O, P, and J have a duty to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs in money.

2. Scope of damages.

A. In light of the contents and methods of the Defendants’ tort prior to the Plaintiffs’ assertion, whether the Defendants were aware of the rape of this case, and the details and degree of damages suffered by the Plaintiffs, Defendant D and E as consolation money, respectively, shall be 35,000.