logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.23 2017고정1689
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving a food car B.

On December 17, 2016, at around 23:20 on December 17, 2016, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely operate the one-way tunnel intersection in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and to prevent the accident from spreading at an unsatisfly speed, depending on the statement in the fact-finding survey document, at the one-lane of the 4-lanes of the Gu, the Gu-satisfy road in the vicinity of the tunnel. Since there is an intersection where a signal is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely operate the signal in accordance with the direction of the signal apparatus and prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left at the front bank, and the defendant conflict with D-si vehicles of the victim C(51) who moved to the fourth-lane of the 4-lane of the 4-lane in the front road from the side of the front road to the front road by the fault of the left-hand turn to the front bank.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury to the victim C, which requires six weeks’ medical treatment, such as coordinates, stoves, and stoves, and the victim E (33 ) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, with approximately three weeks’ right stoves and stoves for the right stoves.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. A survey report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, evidence photographs, black stuffs video CD;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow