(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.12.24 2013고정1086

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.12.24 2013고정1086

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

2. Defendants each of the above facts.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are simplified, and victims D are buildings security guards, victims E, and F employed by auctioners.

On the day of the case, the court enforcement officer visited the construction of the GG factory beyond the auction due to fire, and proceeded with the procedure for the relocation of the factory.

1. Defendant B, around 13:00 on May 7, 2013, during the process of the execution by the court in the (Gu)G located in G G located in Kimhae-si, Defendant B, a security guard employed by the owner of the business who was auctioned the building, was “this son B” on the ground that the victim D (50) who was a security guard employed by the owner of the business, continues to enter the factory before the auction is completed and interfered with the factory, and was taken by both hand after having dumbling the flab of the victim.

As a result, the defendant got 14 days of medical treatment to the victim and got spatitiss.

2. Defendant A and Defendant B’s co-principal at the same time and time as in the foregoing paragraph, Defendant A and the victim E (the 32 years of age), victim F (the 45 years of age), and Defendant F (the 45 years of age) reported to sculbbbbbling the brue of the celebbbbbb in the factory, and sculbling the brue of the victim F, and sculing the brue of the ethth of the victim E, which were sculbling.

In addition, Defendant B, the main victim E, who was frighten of the floor, took the frighten of the boomed by Defendant A, and frighten of the victim E on the ground that the frightened boomed by Defendant A would also cut off the victim E, and frighten of the victim E and the victim F.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put the victim F with multi-lateral diagnosis that requires a two-day medical treatment, and put the victim E with light dynasium that requires a two-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and I;

1. Police against Defendant A.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2012.12.06 2012고정2902

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.08.31 2017고정857

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2013.10.24 2013고단553

-의정부지방법원 2014.05.29 2012고정2473

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.11.12 2012고정2376