logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.04.28 2016고단793
국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who intends to engage in development activities that alter the form and quality of land in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act shall obtain permission from the competent authority;

Nevertheless, on September 2015, the Defendant, without permission from the competent authority, filled up the ground area of 3,654 square meters in total of 5 lots, such as C, D, E, F, and G, Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si, and changed the form and quality of land.

2. A person who intends to divert a mountainous district in violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act shall obtain permission from the competent authority by specifying its use;

Nevertheless, on September 2015, the Defendant, without permission from the competent authority, used the digging season at the place specified in paragraph 1 without permission from the competent authority, converted the use of mountainous districts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Surveys of current status;

1. Land use planning confirmation personnel;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 140 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Article 56 (1) 2 of the same Act (a point of changing the form and quality of land) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 53 subparagraph 1 and 14 (1) of the Mountainous Districts Management Act (a point of diversion of mountainous districts);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishments imposed on a person who violates a mountainous district management with heavier punishment);

1. 형의 선택 벌금형 선택( 범행을 자백하고 반성하고 있는 점, 이 사건 각 범행은 단독주택 택지를 분양하기 위해 택지조성공사를 하면서 나온 흙을 부근 땅에 잠시 � 아 놓았던 것인 점, 이 사건 범행 후 조속한 시일 내에 원상 복구조치를 완료한 점, 동종 전과가 없는 점 등)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow