logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.09.28 2016고단2630
개인정보보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B's imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant C's imprisonment for 4 months, and Defendant D for 3 million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From February 2, 2015, police officers who were working in the position of L police station female youth and female juvenile investigation team, Defendant B are employees in the business of automobile maintenance companies in M, Defendant C are the operators of Nanma treatment offices in the above Nanma treatment offices, Defendant D work in the above Nanma treatment offices in the end of May 2015, and work in the Oanma treatment offices.

No person who manages or has processed personal information shall divulge personal information he/she has become aware of in the course of performing his/her duties or provide another person with personal information without authority, and no person shall knowingly receive such personal information for profit or for any other wrongful

Defendant

Since September 2014, C, while operating a NM place in P from around September 2014, Defendant B, who borrowed an amount equivalent to KRW 33 million from Defendant B, appropriated for the opening of a place of business, such as expenses for interior surgery, but, in the situation where customers are unable to operate the place of massage surgery because they are not different, there is concern that, if the operation of the place of massage surgery is difficult, it would cause serious economic losses,” the remaining Defendant B asked Defendant B to “b to seek photographs of personnel in charge of crackdown on the order order of the police station so that illegal sex trafficking business is not controlled,” and the Defendant B asked Defendant A, who was in a usual sense, to seek pictures of police officers in charge of regulating the public morals belonging to the L police station life order.

1. From May 2015, Defendant A, from around B to May 2015, the Defendant shown the photographs of the orderly community employees so that C operating a massage operation center may avoid the police control. Defendant A’s circumstance is difficult because C was under the control of the radioactive operation around September 2014, which was operated at the time.

“The L police station’s female juvenile and female juvenile investigation team in Q on June 6, 2015, which had received several requests.

arrow