logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.01.12 2016구합52477
장기요양급여비용환수결정 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The details and details of the disposition are as follows: (a) from June 30, 2010 to Jun. 30, 2010, the Plaintiff operated the “C Elderly Welfare Center” (hereinafter “instant center”) which is a communal living home for older persons (hereinafter “instant center”); (b) around May 15, 2014, the building extension work performed and run the “D Care Center” (25) as a sanatorium for older persons (hereinafter “instant medical care center”).

(hereinafter collectively, “each of the instant medical care institutions.” From September 7, 2015 to September 10, 2015, the head of the voice Gun conducted a field investigation on the details of long-term care benefits from August 7, 2014 to September 14, 2014 of the instant center and “from September 15, 2014 to July 2015 of the instant medical care institution” and determined as follows.

4,298,420 1. 4,298,420 . 4,420 . 4,298,420 . 4,20 . 1,000 . . 493,730 . 730 . 20 . . . 20 . . 20 . . . . 20 . . . . . . . . . . 1) were charged with the payment of expenses for benefits in excess of the prescribed number without reduction of the fixed number of employees for five persons, including those who filed a claim for violation of the criteria for the assignment of human resources for disposition in excess of the prescribed number of employees for whom five persons, including those who filed a claim for the reduction of expenses in excess of the prescribed number of employees for whom he/she was admitted. . . . . . . . 3) were additionally charged with the payment of expenses for benefits in excess of the prescribed number of childcare.

arrow