A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On September 19, 2016, in the vicinity of the defendant's residence located in Ansan-si, Masan-si, 19:33 on September 19, 2016, the defendant suffered a loan under his/her own name and used the loan to the defendant for gambling, and he/she was unable to be the subject of his/her ownization while assaulting the above C and stopping in the vicinity of the runway.

The part of the package of the F. E-owned vehicle of the victim E, which is managed by D, was covered by the said part by the one-time vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the car managed by the injured party to the repair cost award.

2. On September 19, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the vicinity of the above Defendant’s residence, and at around around September 19, 2016, the Defendant was subject to the police officer G, a police officer who was dispatched to the above place after receiving a report of 112 stating that he/she is attempting to leave the vehicle, and assault him/her to commit an act of assault, etc. from the police officer, who was dispatched to the above place, and the said police officer “Isk shot s

By means of intimidation such as “intimidating” and spiting spits on the face of the police officer two times.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is in charge of 112 reporting duties, threatened the police officer in charge of the 112 reporting duties with intimidation and assault and interfered with legitimate performance

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to G or D;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of six copies of the photograph related to the case

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple offenses under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of the punishment recommended) (the scope of the punishment recommended), including the confession of and against the defendant, the agreement with the victim of the damage to property, and the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment, excluding once the fine of this kind, etc. is imposed: the crime from June to September 1 to September 1 (the obstruction of the performance of official duties).