logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.22 2016가단509873
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Defendant D Co., Ltd. shall enter the Plaintiff’s successor in the attached list.

Reasons

Ⅰ. Part of the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff

1. Indication of claim;

A. On February 16, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant E”) by adding the lease term from February 16, 2015 to February 15, 202, the lease deposit amount of KRW 200 million, monthly rent of KRW 7 million from April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2018, and the following day to March 31, 2020, KRW 800,000 (excluding value-added tax) to KRW 990,000 to KRW 15,000,000 (excluding value-added tax) according to daily sales from the day following the due date until the due date until the due date until the due date of payment of value-added tax to KRW 185,00,000,000,0000,000,000 to the date of termination or termination of the lease agreement.

Defendant E shall pay 60 million won out of the down payment of 20 million won and the remainder, and shall not pay the remainder of 120 million won.

B. On October 21, 2015, the Plaintiff, Defendant E, and Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) entered into a contract to change the lessee under the instant lease agreement from Defendant E to Defendant D, but, on the other hand, Defendant E and F jointly and severally guaranteed all the obligations owed by Defendant D under the instant lease agreement, and on the other hand, Defendant D succeeded to the instant lease agreement.

In addition, Defendant D agreed to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 5 million due to the overdue interest and other incidental expenses under the instant lease agreement.

(c)be due to rent;

arrow