Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving CF vehicles.

On June 4, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on June 19:10, and tried to drive the above vehicle in the direction of the distance of folk village bus stops in the direction of folk village.

At this point, since the signal lights and crosswalks are installed, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of driving a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to live the front door well and safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, despite the fact that the automobile signal, etc. was sent to the left, the defendant, as it was due to the fault of the driver, caused the victim's body failure to cut to the left from the right side of the above vehicle according to the pedestrian signals.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as crushing and crushing of minct aggregate, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment by occupational negligence, to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph, ctv image closures;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration of the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. Where the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [the scope of recommendation] general traffic accident injury (type 1) [the person who has been injured by traffic accident] [the person who has been injured by traffic] under the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Specialized School Act [the decision of sentence] disadvantageous circumstances: The defendant's negligence is serious because the defendant has shocked the pedestrian on the crosswalk in violation of the signal, and the degree of the victim's injury is not easy: The defendant's criminal act is recognized and against the victim; the defendant deposited money (type 1 million) for the victim; and the comprehensive insurance was subscribed.