1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) Attached drawings (base drawings) shall be indicated in the underground room of the real estate stated in the attached list.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 31, 2013, the Plaintiffs agreed to lease deposit money of KRW 25,00,00, monthly rent of KRW 1,815,000 (Additional Taxation), management fee of KRW 40,00,00 (Additional Taxation), management fee of KRW 400,00 (Additional Taxation), and period of lease from June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014, regarding the underground room of the real estate listed in the separate sheet in which the Plaintiffs shared shares of 1/2, and KRW 165,00,00 for the portion of the building attached to the ship (including the basement multi-story and toilets and passages among the real estate listed in the separate sheet in the separate sheet; hereinafter “instant building”) connected each point, and the lessor may immediately terminate the lease contract if at least two rent have been paid.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

The Defendant received the instant building from the Plaintiffs, and had ASEAN operate the said building with the trade name “E” in the said building.

C. Although the instant lease contract has been renewed even after the expiration of the contract term, the Defendant delayed payment of rent and management fee under the instant lease contract from March 2014 to ten times, and the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease by serving the duplicate of the complaint.

Although the Defendant paid the rent and management fee in three times after the filing of the instant lawsuit, the lower court did not have paid the rent and management fee after March 1, 2016 as of the date of the closing of argument in the instant case.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including branch numbers in case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the fact that the lease contract of this case was terminated, the defendant did not pay two or more vehicles, and the plaintiffs sought the termination of the lease contract of this case and the return of the leased object.