1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

... 사건 토목공사를, 피고는 이 사건 공사 중 철골패널공사를 각 도급받은 것으로 보이고, 위 사실만으로 이에 반하여 피고가 이 사건 공사 전체를 도급받아 원고에게 이 사건 토목공사를 하도급 주었음을 인정하기에 부족하며, 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없다. 가) 인정사실 ① 원고는 2015. 6. 10. 이 사건 공사 착공신고서가 제출된 직후 이 사건 토목공사를 시작하였는데, 피고와의 하도급계약서는 그때부터 한참 지난 2015. 9. 1.에서야 작성되었다. ② 원고와 피고의 하도급계약서의 내용은 아래와 같은데, 하도급계약서에는 달리 공사하도급 계약조건, 설계도 및 시방서가 첨부되어 있지 않다. 《하도급계약서

5. Contract amount: 237,380,000 won (excluding surtax);

6. Payment of the price;

(a) Contract deposit: None;

(b) A completed portion: None;

(c) Completion money: The principal contract (the defendant) may not be claimed as the principal contract enterprise within the next day after receipt of the amount from the ordering office (F) * the subcontractor may not be claimed as the principal contract enterprise at the time of receipt of the failure of the original contract;

7. Items and quantities of materials to be paid: None;

8. Contract bond: Each of the parties to the agreement shall be entitled to enter into a subcontract with the terms and conditions of the agreement of a supplementary construction project, design drawings () and specifications, and prepare two copies of the contract, respectively;

③ On June 8, 2015, C awarded to H (hereinafter “H”) a contract for electrical, telecommunication, and fire fighting works among the instant construction works for KRW 70,40,000,00, and F awarded a contract for the installation of the instant construction works for KRW 54,780,000 among the instant construction works to a limited liability company I (hereinafter “I”) on July 7, 2015. On August 28, 2015, C awarded a contract for the instant construction works for KRW 43,400,000.

Each of the above construction costs shall be the same as the amount of estimates, etc. based on a written estimate or contract statement attached to the contract.

(4) The defendant shall be F.