Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B은 2016. 7. 29. 05:40 경 광주시 포 돌이로 77 ‘ 탄 벌 중학교’ 앞 노상에서, ‘ 누군가 오토바이를 빼앗으려 하는 것 같다’ 는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 광주 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경장인 피해자 E 등이 순찰차에서 내리려 하자, 순찰차에 다가와 “ 내가 뭘 잘못 했냐.

Purpose of this Act

“..........” The chest of the above E was pushed down.

As the above E continues to be “the report has been received,” Ba Ba Ba b,

Chewing . The bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, “in prison,” and the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.

Accordingly, the reasons why F was called together with the above E were the following: (a) Defendant A conspired to issue a penalty payment boiler to Defendant B for violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act; and (b) Defendant G’s chest, a policeman belonging to the same district group, who was called together with the above E, was sealed by the two losses, and the arms of the above G were sealed.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 reporting processing and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes governing field video CDs;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each Criminal Procedure Act / [Defendant A] / The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act / However, the defendant is a person who has no record of investigation and punishment against juvenile interests, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a state of interest concerns over criminal punishment of Defendant B of friendly arrest.

B. It is caused by the excessive misunderstanding of penalties against Defendant B by the victimized police officers.