A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant committed the following crimes in a state that the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the mental delay of the current concurrentness, etc.:

On January 25, 2017, the Defendant, around 14:15, 2017, committed an indecent act against the victim E (the 16-year-old age) by drinking the victim E (the 16-year-old age-) who passed from the window C apartment of Changwon-si around the window of Changwon-si, by inducing the victim to commit an indecent act against the victim by selling after the victim himself, and by forcing the victim to commit an indecent act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to E (victim);

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (such as dispatch to the scene);

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 298 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., conditions favorable to the following grounds for sentencing):

1. Article 62-2 (1) and proviso to Article 62-2 (2) of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation;

1. There are special circumstances in which an order to attend a lecture may not be imposed, comprehensively taking account of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, criminal record, risk of repeating a crime, Defendant’s medical history, etc., acknowledged through the records of this case and the theory of changes, etc.

[Determination]

1. In full view of the Defendant’s age, environment, criminal records, the risk of recidivism, and other benefits and preventive effects expected by the instant disclosure order or notification order, as well as the disadvantages and side effects therefrom, etc., the Defendant’s personal information disclosure should not be disclosed, pursuant to the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (hereinafter “Juveniles against Sexual Abuse”).

The judgment of conviction against the instant crime, which is a sex offense subject to the registration of new information, is finalized.