1. The Defendant’s imposition of KRW 40,208,00,000 against the Plaintiff on January 8, 2018 exceeds KRW 36,60,00.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff to conduct the defendant's cadastral resurvey project is the owner of Busan Shipping Daegu B big 639 square meters (hereinafter "the land in this case").

On January 26, 2016, the Defendant publicly announced the implementation plan of the Busan Metropolitan City Construction Project (D District) of the Busan Metropolitan City Construction Project (D District) from January 2016 to December 2017, the project period of which was implemented from January 26, 2016, including the instant land, and heard opinions from the landowners within the instant project zone, and the owners of the Plaintiff et al. consented to the implementation of the instant project.

On June 3, 2016, the Mayor of Busan Metropolitan City publicly announced the Seoul Special Metropolitan City cadastral resurvey project district in Busan Special Metropolitan City on June 3, 2016.

On July 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) designated and announced the Vice Governor of the Korea Land Information Corporation in Busan as a survey and survey agent on July 25, 2016; (b) completed a boundary survey on December 2016; and (c) as a result, the boundary around the instant land was partially changed as indicated in the “Before and after the implementation of the project” in attached Table 1; and (d) the actual area of the instant land was increased from 639 square meters to 647 square meters; and (b) the actual area of the instant land was increased from

On February 28, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of a cadastral confirmation statement that the area of the instant land has increased by 8 square meters as a result of the cadastral resurvey survey. On May 31, 2017, the Busan Metropolitan City Maritime Daegu Boundary Determination Committee of Boundary Determination on Land, including the cadastral confirmation statement on the instant land, deliberated on the cadastral confirmation statement on each land within the instant project district, and decided to determine boundaries as indicated in the cadastral confirmation statement.

On June 1, 2017, the Defendant notified landowners within the instant project district of the boundary determination, and the Plaintiff did not raise any objection to the said boundary determination.

On November 29, 2017, the Defendant publicly announced that the instant project was completed, and accordingly.