logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.12.14 2016가단217955
건물명도
Text

1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant E, F, G, and H jointly order each real estate listed in the separate list of real estate;

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On January 25, 2016, the Plaintiffs entered into a commercial lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with Defendant D with the content that each of the real estate listed in the real estate list (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) as indicated in the attached Table on Real Estate (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) shall be KRW 300,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 18,150,000 (including value-added tax) and the lease period from January 26, 2016 to November 20, 2017.

B. Defendant D operated a marina in each of the instant real estate, and sublet it to Nonparty J without permission, and the above J subleted it to Defendant E.

C. Defendant G and H jointly occupy each of the instant real estate for the purpose of securing claims by transferring part of Defendant F and E, the representative of various suppliers supplied to Eart, who disposed of and locking most of the goods of Defendant E. D.

Defendant D pays only rent until March 24, 2016, and does not pay rent for at least three months.

E. The plaintiffs notify Defendant D of the termination of the instant lease agreement on the ground that the service of the duplicate of the complaint of this case without permission sub-lease of the leased object and the monthly rent at least three times in arrears.

F. Defendant E, F, G, and H occupy each of the instant real property without any title.

G. I has been awarded a successful bid on the building listed in the attached list No. 3 of the real estate list, which is left alone in the above building.

2. Defendant E: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

3. Defendant F, G, H, and I: Judgment on confession and deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

4. Although the above defendant recognized the plaintiff's claim, the above defendant further asserted that the remaining deposit will be refunded after deducting the deposit amount of KRW 300,000 from that of KRW 300,000.

This is the defense and rent of the simultaneous performance of the deposit.

arrow