logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.01.14 2019구합75441
교통유발부담금부과처분 취소
Text

1. The defendant

A. On October 8, 2020, the period of imposition against the Plaintiff was from August 1, 2019 to July 31, 2020.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff is a school foundation that operates B University (hereinafter “instant school”).

C There are ten colleges, 7 graduate schools, etc. in the main campus of the instant school located in the Si.

The Plaintiff owns E-dong buildings located in D and 41 lots within the main campus of the instant school (the name of the building is F).

With respect to each of the following facilities (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant facilities” among the instant facilities used as neighborhood living facilities, cultural and assembly facilities (e.g., F), the Defendant did not present the following measures, including (a) the period of imposition from August 1, 2019 to July 31, 2020; (b) the imposition of traffic charges of KRW 5,450,10; and (b) the imposition of traffic charges of KRW 10 to October 1, 2019; and (c) the imposition of the charges of KRW 20 to KRW 7,04,430; and (c) the imposition of the charges of KRW 1 to October 31, 2019; and (e) the imposition of the charges of KRW 20 to KRW 36,70; and (c) the imposition of the charges of traffic charges of KRW 1 to 36,718; and (g) the imposition of the charges of KRW 18,719.

Article 17 (1) 5 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Promotion of Urban Traffic Improvement, which is claimed to be exempted from charges for traffic inducement, shall be educated at schools established in accordance with high school education laws, etc.

arrow