All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendants in the summary of the grounds for appeal (the suspended sentence of six months for each imprisonment) is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendants were subject to a disposition of suspending indictment for special larceny in the past, even though there was a history that the Defendants had been subject to the previous disposition of suspending indictment for the crime of special larceny, the Defendants’ liability for the crime of this case is not easy. However, considering the fact that the Defendants confessioned the crime of this case and reflected depth, the amount of damage is not significant, the Defendants do not want the punishment by mutual consent with the victim, and the Defendants do not want the punishment, except for those subject to the disposition of suspending indictment, the Defendants’ family members are leading to the Defendants, and the Defendants’ respective ages, character, character, environment, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing, including the following circumstances, the sentence against the Defendants is too unjustifiable, and thus, the prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, it is dismissed in entirety under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.