logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.12.01 2016노1705
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (fact-finding) is that the business establishment in this case differs from the general marina business establishment, the defendant was aware of the fact that G was controlled by the police due to sexual traffic, the defendant was operating a fireworks house on the first floor of the building where the business establishment in this case was located, and the defendant's failure to visit the business establishment in this case even though A was in arrears, it is difficult to understand that the defendant did not visit the business establishment in this case formally, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant, even though the defendant could be deemed as having known that sexual traffic was being conducted at least at least at least at least at the business establishment in this case.

2. The court below rendered a not-guilty verdict against the defendant on the grounds as stated in its holding, and examined the various circumstances recognized by the court below closely by comparing them with records, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the prosecutor.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow