logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.03.18 2013고단409
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On November 16, 1996, at around 21:15, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by a road management authority by loading and operating freight exceeding 10 ton of 12.1 ton of a 12.1 ton of a 12.1 ton of a d8 tons truck at the port of the Korea Highway Corporation located at a point of 11.5 kilometers along the Young-dong Expressway Highway, in connection with the Defendant’s duties.

2. The prosecutor charged the facts charged in this case by applying Articles 86, 83(1)2, and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005). The Constitutional Court held in Article 86 of the above Act that "if an employee of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 with respect to the corporation's business, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under Article 83(1)2 of the above Act," that "the above provision of the Act, which is a applicable provision of the above facts charged, shall be retroactively invalidated."

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow