1. As to Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint and several liability for KRW 38,453,487 to the Plaintiff and KRW 33,098,487 to the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff's ground for the judgment on the defendant A and the defendant B is as stated in the attached Form, and the above defendants are not in dispute.

Therefore, with respect to the amount of indemnity of KRW 38,453,487 and its 33,098,487 among them, Defendant A and Defendant B jointly and severally have an obligation to pay the Plaintiff 6% per annum from February 8, 2014 to March 9, 2014, the date following the date of subrogation, 9% per annum from March 10, 2014 to May 8, 2014, the agreed interest rate of KRW 9% per annum from March 10, 2014 to May 9, 2014, the date after May 9, 201, the date after 201 to the date of final delivery of the complaint as to the said Defendants; 15% per annum from the following day to the date after 20% per annum from the date after 10th of December 10, 2014 to the date of full payment; 20% from the date after 10th of April 15, 2014.

In full view of Gap evidence No. 1-1 to No. 8-3 of each evidence No. 1-3 of this Court's establishment of creditor's right of revocation as to the remaining defendants, and the whole purport of the arguments as a result of the fact inquiry to the Supreme Court's private viewing tax department, No. 1-3 and No. 4 of this Attached Claim No. 1-1 to No. 8-3 of this Court,

(b) recognize the same facts as the description.

If so, paragraph 4 (c) and (d) of the attached Table.

As stated in the above, each legal act constitutes an act detrimental to a creditor and must be cancelled. The defendants are obligated to implement each procedure for cancellation registration as restitution.

To the extent that such a juristic act objectively constitutes an act detrimental to the obligee.