beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 30,002,00 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from June 1, 2016 to January 26, 2018.
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company running distribution business, door-to-door sales business under sponsorship, manufacturing and selling cosmetics, etc., and the Plaintiff’s door-to-door salesman under sponsorship (hereinafter “door-to-door salesman”).
2) The Plaintiff’s door-to-door seller’s business activities are as follows: (a) a place used as a space or office for supporting the Plaintiff’s business activities; and (b) an interview.
3) The Defendant (one person) is a door-to-door seller who entered into a beauty agreement with the Plaintiff and a person who worked as a person in charge of the operation of the beauty industry located in the Ulsan-gu area (hereinafter “ beauty industry establishment”). (B) On September 4, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the lease and sub-lease of real estate with the Kudong Broadcasting (hereinafter “Madong Broadcasting”) which is a foundation, on September 4, 2009, with the 6th 530.67 square meters (160.81 square meters; hereinafter “the instant real estate”). From September 4, 2009 to May 31, 2010, the Plaintiff should pay the 50.6 square meters (160.81 square meters; hereinafter “the instant real estate”) of the 13th Do-gu building located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, as the management fee per month.
2) On January 29, 2010, the Defendant concluded a sublease contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, between January 29, 2010 and May 31, 2010, to set the instant real estate amounting to KRW 0,700,00 per month from January 29, 2010, to KRW 2,70,000 per month, and to pay KRW 8,000 per month as management expenses to the Plaintiff. (C) The Defendant entered into a beauty contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant. The Defendant is a door-to-door salesman who entered into a beauty contract with the Plaintiff, and on February 16, 2010, between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, “the Defendant is performing duties, such as operating the Plaintiff’s mountain beauty, and receiving subsidies, etc. from the Plaintiff.”