logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.01 2018고단5104
특수폭행
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 6, 2018, Defendant A, at around 20:15, 2018, the victim D (V, 54 years of age) located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was drunk and was able to dump the victim’s simple beds, and was able to dump the victim’s desire.

After that, the Defendant was transferred to another table, which was sub-speed by the victim, and the Defendant continued to order the beer to the victim, but the victim continued to order the beer, which was a dangerous object on the table of the defect that “the victim would download.....”

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. Defendant B ordered beer and beer to the victim, along with the date, time, and place specified in the above Paragraph (1) above, but the victim ordered beer and beer who was a dangerous object on the table of the defect that “I Do Do h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (victim D's telephone conversations) and investigation reports (on-site verification);

1. Defendants in charge of criminal facts: Articles 261 and 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 261 and 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 26 of the fine [Defendant B asserts that beer’s disease on the table was set away from the floor rather than having injured the beer. However, in light of the victim’s statement on damage situations and the place where beer’s disease fell away, etc., it can be acknowledged that beer’s disease was committed as described in paragraph (2) of the judgment by Defendant B]

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow