All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence (a fine of KRW 10 million is imposed on the Defendants (a fine of KRW 10 million, confiscation. Defendant B: a fine of KRW 5 million, confiscation) imposed on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the circumstances that are the conditions for the sentencing of this case, including the defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime of this case, degree of involvement, size of business, period of business, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendants is too unreasonable, and the defendant B is a aiding and abetting offender, which is favorable to the defendants. However, although the defendant B had already been punished for the same kind of crime, he again committed the crime of this case by reflecting the above favorable circumstances, and the judgment below seems to have determined the punishment by reflecting the above favorable circumstances. In full view of all other circumstances, the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendants is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendants' assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.