A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from March 2, 2012 to December 22, 2012, was a person working for a staff who delivers coffee from the “Eda” located in Ulsannam-gu, Ulsan-gu, as an employee who delivers coffee, and the victim F(59) is a person with a long-term disability that prevents him from normally leaving the left part of his body due to his electric accident.

The defendant tried to obtain money that shows a deposit passbook from a victim to a customer by finding the victim as a customer and paying interest to the defendant, and "Marriageic Sea Security System and inside".

In fact, since the Defendant had been in congested with another other patriotic person from December 28, 2012, the Defendant found the apartment of the victim several times of living together with the victim without his/her intention to marry or marry, and took place as if he/she had no intention to marry with the victim. On the other hand, in order to get clothes to provide funds necessary for living together, it is false that KRW 200,000 is necessary by purchasing loan money, vehicle, etc. The Defendant received KRW 18,108,150,000 from December 4, 2012 to February 12, 2013 by receiving KRW 8,000 from the victim on the same method as indicated in the attached list of crimes, including the issuance of one check of KRW 8,00,000 from the date of living together with the victim on December 28, 2012 to the date of February 15, 2013, and received property from the victim by deceiving him/her.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and G;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (generally, the choice of imprisonment with labor);

1. Article 57 of the Criminal Act including days of pre-trial detention;

1. The sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution has been expected as if the victim were living together with the victim who did not have an ordinary ability to determine the sentencing, and then the amount of damage has been acquired by defrauding money, and has not become a significant large number

However, the victim himself is still the defendant.