logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.11.14 2013노4227
사기등
Text

The judgment below

Of them, the part concerning Defendant C shall be reversed.

Defendant

C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant .

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserted that the sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment for each of the defendants A, B, and a fine of five million won for each of the defendants C) is too unreasonable because the sentence of the defendant A and C is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the sentence of the defendant A and B is too uneased so that the sentence of the defendant A and B is too uneasible.

2. Determination:

A. We examine the judgment on Defendant A’s assertion and the Prosecutor’s argument about Defendant A, the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, the first offender, the degree of participation in the crime by taking advantage of the other accomplices’ instruction as if the genuine real estate purchaser or seller were the real estate purchaser or seller, and the actual gain of the crime in this case does not seem to exist. The circumstances and circumstances favorable to the Defendant are mostly considered in the lower court, and most of these circumstances were considered in the lower court. The Defendant took large measures from the accomplices and took part in the crime, and took part in the crime. The Defendant took part in the crime against the victim Incheon Agricultural Cooperative. The Defendant’s fraud committed against the victim Incheon Agricultural Cooperative is not only a planned and organized crime, but also a method such as the crime of forging documents, but also a case involving the crime of forging documents, and the amount of damage is not less than 429 million won, and the circumstances that the damage was recovered, and the circumstances that do not seem to be disadvantageous to the Defendant, the circumstances and circumstances of the Defendant’s occupation, character and behavior, etc. are considered in light of the records.

B. We examine the Prosecutor’s argument on Defendant B, the fact that the Defendant recognized the Prosecutor’s mistake and reflects it, and that the Defendant can only be sentenced to a fine for negligence.

arrow