1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendant rendered a decision that constituted a person of distinguished service to the State on April 2, 2012 to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 1, 1950, the Plaintiff entered the Air Force and received new illness education by October 20 of the same year, and was placed in a new air airfield near riwon and worked at night on a yearly basis on October 23 of the same year on October 23 of the same year. On October 29 of the same year, the Plaintiff was discharged from the military service on the ground floor on October 29 of the same year after he was sent back to the Air Force Hospital for a long time after being hospitalized.

B. On September 28, 201, the Plaintiff was above-mentioned.

The Defendant applied for the registration of persons of distinguished services to the State on the ground that the cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage c

C. On the other hand, the Defendant cannot verify whether the Plaintiff’s disease that was sent to the Air Force Hospital during military service and hospitalized treatment was a tuberculosis cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage

[Grounds for Recognition: entry of evidence No. 1 and purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Plaintiff entered the Plaintiff’s healthy condition, but had undergone a high level of new illness training for 20 days after entering the Plaintiff, continued to work at night at night at a time of a tension with the enemy after being placed at a new airfield, and was unable to properly provide meals due to the poor spread in wartime.