Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

On January 23, 2019, the Defendant 01:24 around 01:24, on the road of the “C” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, the Defendant her own fright and panty panty, and spanched panty.

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly committed an obscene act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of this Act and subordinate statutes to a CCTV screen or to a closure of a field image;

1. Article 245 of the Criminal Act and Article 245 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are recognized as the defendant committed the crime, and efforts have been made to recover damage, such as paying 5.5 million won to two victims each. The defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions indicated in the present arguments and the records shall be comprehensively considered.

A crime in the judgment on whether to issue an order to register, disclose, or disclose personal information is an offense provided for in Article 2 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, which does not constitute a sex offense subject to the registration of personal information provided for in Article 42 (1) of the same Act, and does not constitute a sex offense subject to an order to disclose or notify personal information provided for in Articles 47 and 49 of the same Act, and thus,

In full view of the following circumstances: the Defendant exempted from an employment restriction order; the type and content of the offense; the process of the offense; the social interest expected by the public disclosure order and the employment restriction order; the effect of the prevention of sexual crimes; the disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant; etc., the Defendant shall not be subject to an employment restriction order.