The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal lies in the lower court’s assertion that certain crimes were subject to reduction of mental and physical penalty. However, the first instance court fully accepted the facts charged and reflects the error in depth.

The defendant is planning to reach an agreement with the victims even through a small father.

The defendant saw the drinking and again refrain from committing such a crime.

In addition, in the case of assault cases, it is difficult to punish the defendant as much as possible in consideration of the fact that the victim's desire first and the use of violence is the cause and the degree of damage is not significant, and in the case of fraud, the amount of damage is the small amount.

2. The Defendant was subject to the disposition of 30 days’ fine for violation of discipline by engaging in obscene acts, etc. without any reflective behavior while being detained in the instant case.

In addition, considering the circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant and the defendant's age, sex, career, family relation, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment, the lower court's punishment is too unreasonable, even in light of various circumstances asserted by the defendant on the grounds of appeal.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.