The case where it cannot be deemed that a decision was omitted on important matters affecting the judgment;

In light of the contents of the final and conclusive judgment, it is not a case where the decision was rejected as to the assertion of violation of the rules of evidence by the re-appellant, and it is not a case where the decision was neglected.

Article 422(1)9 of the Civil Procedure Act

Plaintiff

Defendant

Supreme Court

The retrial lawsuit is dismissed.

The litigation costs for retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff for retrial.

The grounds for retrial of the plaintiff's attorney for retrial are examined.

According to the records of this case, the court below held that the 67Na2151 case (hereinafter referred to as "the 7Na62151 case")'s final and conclusive judgment was lawful and that the 6-year auction price declaration was not based on the 6-year auction agreement, and that the 6-year auction price declaration was not based on the 4-year auction agreement, and that the 6-year auction price declaration was not based on the 6-year auction agreement, and that the 6-year auction price declaration was not based on the 6-year auction agreement, and that the 6-year auction price declaration was not based on the 6-year auction agreement, and that the 6-year auction price declaration was not based on the 1-year auction agreement, and that the 6-year auction price declaration was not based on the 6-year auction agreement, and that the 1-year auction price declaration was not based on the 1-year auction agreement, and that the 1-year auction ruling was not based on the 1-year auction agreement.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed by the assent of all participating judges, and the costs of the appeal are assessed against the plaintiff for the retrial. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Justices of the Supreme Court Do-dong (Presiding Judge) Do-dong (Presiding Justice)