logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.03.23 2016고단2095
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 20, 2016, the Defendant damaged that the repair cost amounting to approximately KRW 150,00,000, by cutting off the door door door glass from a week due to a fire while drinking a daily and alcoholic beverage at a D restaurant operated by the victim C in the Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on interference with the performance of official duties and interference with the 119 Rescue and Emergency Medical Services and the 119 Rescue and Emergency Medical Services (hereinafter referred to as “Act”), followed the fire officials called for the Defendant’s medical treatment by suffering from the upper part of the lusium, such as “Chewing sprink,” etc., on the part of the lusium, and blusium the lusium of the fire officials called together with the lusium of the lusium of the lusium of the lusium of the lusium of the 119 Rescue and Emergency Medical Services.

The Defendant continued to appear at the scene after receiving a report of 112, and tried to walk the Ha’s sacrife of a police box belonging to the 112 police box, and to walk the Ha’s sacrife of a police box belonging to the same police box, and walk the Ha’s sacrife of a police officer belonging to the same police box five times, and to walk the Ha’s sacrife of a police officer after arresting him as a flagrant.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the emergency services activities of 119 emergency medical service members, and at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of fire officers and police officers concerning emergency treatment and the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and H;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of F, E, and C;

1. Articles 366, 136 (1), and 28 and 13 (2) of the Act on Rescue and Emergency Medical Services concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the punishment for the crime of this case is not less light in light of the method and content of the crime of this case. However, the defendant's mistake is divided, reflected against the defendant, and the property is damaged.

arrow