1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

가. 원고의 이 사건 등록상표(갑2호증) 1) 출원일/ 등록일/ 등록번호 : C/ D/ E 2) 구 성 : 3) 지정상품 : 상품류 구분 제30류의 장(醬 류

(b) Previously registered trademark (Evidence 3) 1)/ Date of registration / date of extinguishment / Registration / Number : F/ G/H/I2) previous designated goods: high trends of Category 30 in the classification of goods, booms, booms, Cheongju, Ssamju, Ssamju, Meet and Meet;

다. 피고의 선출원상표들 1) 선출원상표 1(갑4호증의1) 가) 출원일/ 등록일/ 등록번호 : J/ K/ L 나) 구 성 : 다) 지정상품 : 상품류 구분 제30류의 간장, 고추장, 된장, 자장, 장(醬)류, 청국장, 춘장, 쌈장 2) 선출원상표 2(갑4호증의2) 가) 출원일/ 등록일/ 등록번호 : M/ N/ O 나) 구 성 : 다) 지정상품 : 상품류 구분 제30류의 간장, 고추장, 된장, 자장, 장(醬)류, 청국장, 춘장, 쌈장

D. (1) On November 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) against the Plaintiff who is the trademark holder of the instant registered trademark “” in the Intellectual Property Tribunal; (b) the instant registered trademark is similar to the prior registered trademark and the earlier-registered trademark 1, 2; and (c) the designated goods are identical or similar to the designated goods, and fall under Articles 7(1)7 and 8(1) of the former Trademark Act (wholly amended by Act No. 1403, Feb. 29, 2016; hereinafter “former Trademark Act”); and (d) the registration thereof should be invalidated.

2) After examining the aforementioned request for a trial by the Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board on May 30, 2018, the instant request for a trial by the Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board did not violate the principle of res judicata in relation to the relationship with the 2014Heo6460, an appeal against the decision of refusal.

Furthermore, the registered trademark of this case and the prior registered trademark of this case are not more than the appearance of each other, but the registered trademark of this case can be divided into “seamark,” which is a figure part, and “satisfin,” which is a text part, and the prior registered trademark has a central distinctive character.