logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.08.31 2015누10849
이행강제금부과처분 취소
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The disposition imposing enforcement fines imposed on the Plaintiff on October 22, 2013 is revoked.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The court's explanation on this part of the cited judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

Except as mentioned in paragraph (2), it is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Part 1) Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 8 of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Private Teaching Institutes and Extracurricular Lessons (hereinafter “Private Teaching Institutes Act”) in Section 2 of Section 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “A private teaching institute (A. E.)” in the judgment of the court of first instance, “A. E.” in the judgment of first instance as indicated below, “A. E. On the other hand, C. on May 27, 2013, the head of Seo-gu District Office of Education of the Daejeon District Office of Education of the District Office of Education (hereinafter “Private Teaching Institutes Act”).

)에 따라 위와 같은 학원의 명칭에, 학원의 종류를 ‘학교교과교습학원(무용)’, 교습과정을 ‘예능 계열의 무용{댄스스포츠(성인, 학생, 자격증)}’, 교습과목을 ‘라틴댄스 5종목, 모던댄스 5종목’, 일시 수용능력인원을 ‘156명’의 내용으로 학원등록을 신청하였다. 그러나 대전광역시 서부교육지원청 교육장은 2013. 5. 31. C이 교육과정으로 신청한 댄스스포츠는 체육시설의 설치ㆍ이용에 관한 법률(이하 ‘체육시설법’이라 한다

Pursuant to the report as sports facility business, C was not subject to the Private Institutes Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and the application for registration of a driving school was not accepted.

2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 이 사건 댄스스포츠학원은 국제표준무도(볼룸댄스)를 교습하는 학원법상 학교교과교습학원이므로...

arrow