logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.29 2016나2047193
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The first instance court accepted the Plaintiff’s claim on the principal lawsuit and dismissed the Defendant’s counterclaim. Since the Defendant appealed only against the counterclaim, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part concerning the counterclaim among the judgment of the first instance.

2. The reasoning for the court's explanation on this part is as stated in the part of "2. Judgment on the counterclaim" in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding "No. 4 and "No. 6" to "No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance." Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the defendant's counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow