1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 25, 2013, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Army and discharged from military service on March 24, 2015, and claimed that he/she sustained an injury from the "Yeeeeman" (hereinafter referred to as the "instant accident") caused by moving to a place during the exercise course conducted from July 7, 2014 to July 11, 2014. The Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran's compensation on June 10, 2015.

B. However, on January 8, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision that the proximate causal relationship between the instant wound and the State’s security, or the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the protection of the people’s lives and property cannot be acknowledged. Based on the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement that the proximate causal relationship cannot be acknowledged between the instant wound and the State’s security, or the performance of duties or education and training not directly related to the protection of the people’s lives and property, the Plaintiff does not meet the requirements of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”) and Article 2(1)2 of the Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with each of the instant dispositions and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the request for administrative appeal was dismissed on July 5, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 5, 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of each of the dispositions of this case

A. The plaintiff's main claim and the main claim of the preliminary claim are as follows: (a) the plaintiff received medical treatment after the occurrence of the accident in this case, and as a result, "Irregrative flusium and conversive stitusium"