The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who, from around 2005, works as a medical specialist in the rehabilitation department in the E hospital located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and is engaged in the diagnosis, surgery, surgery, medication, etc. of patients suffering from burgic diseases.

On July 11, 2016, the Defendant diagnosed the victim F (n, 55 years of age) who was blurgical pain with the hurgical pain from the above E Hospital, and proposed to perform the hurgical hurgical surgery and the hurgical hurgical hurgical hurgical hurgic hurgical hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurgic hurg.

At the time, the victim constantly complained of pains after the procedure, and around July 25, 2016, to examine the cause of pains, the victim has been performing the MOI inspection on the part of the victim's blurium and the blurine. In such a case, the defendant, who is a doctor in charge of the procedure and treatment for the victim, has a duty of care to check the side effects of the procedure and to take necessary measures to prevent aggravation of symptoms by properly examining the patient's condition, such as accurately reading the results of the CRI inspection after the procedure.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from around July 12, 2016, immediately after the procedure, constantly complaining of the pain, did not cause a problem of infections after the procedure of this case.