beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.
However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants are workers who work in the company F located in the office of the petitioner E-Gu building D at the Cheongju-si.
1. Defendant A
A. On April 23, 2017, the Defendant attempted rape: (a) at the second floor office of the said company around April 24:0, 2017, in a manner that the victim G (at the age of 21) who is the same company charged with the said company, and the girree works at night time, had the victim rape by advertising, and (b) placed in a stroke stroke that prepared in advance exemption from the number of ingredients of the stroke m, and caused the victim to drink.
At around 01:40 on the 24th of the same month, the Defendant exceeded the victim's upper legs and brokes, and cut off the victim's chests and panty, let the victim leave the Defendant's ste and panty, and let the victim leave the ste and panty, pushed down the victim's panty on the panty panty of the victim, continued to have the victim's sexual intercourse, and tried to have the victim sexual intercourse with the victim, but the victim who became the mind of the cellular Belgium was tight, sealed, tight, and resisted with the victim's mind in the cell phone Belgium, and attempted to do so.
B. When the Defendant was investigated by an investigative agency as a crime under the foregoing paragraph (a), G saw that G would cover the exemption from the number of ingredients on a stroke m, and the Defendant was willing to forge the evidence as if he did not contain any fact that he had been exempted from the number of ingredients on a stroke m.
On April 24, 2017, at the “I” parking lot located in Cheongju-si Office H around 10:00, the Defendant, who knows that the Defendant was under investigation of the suspicion that the Defendant was eating drugs to G and having attempted to rape, may be exempted from suspicion if he confirmed that he was under investigation.
The purpose of this paper is to say that the test to seek a similar drug is that “I request B to leave the G things located in the company’s escape room”, thereby inducing B to instigate evidence regarding a criminal case.