1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

가. 이 사건 등록상표(갑2호증) 1) 출원일/ 등록결정일/ 등록일/ 등록번호 : C/ 2010. 1. 26./ D/ E 2) 구 성 : 3) 지정상품 : 상품류 구분 제4류의 공업용 왁스, 목랍(木蠟), 미가공 왁스, 밀랍, 방향 양초, 벨트용 왁스, 세레신(Ceresine), 수지(獸脂)양초, 양초, 양초용 심지, 옻나무 왁스, 조명용 양초, 조명용 왁스, 지랍(오조케라이트), 카노바 왁스, 크리스마스트리용 양초, 파라핀, 파라핀 왁스, 향수 초, 향수 양초, 황랍(黃蠟

B. Defendant’s pre-use trademarks (including evidence Nos. 9, 11, 16, 17, and 17; hereinafter the same shall apply) 1 of the pre-use trademarks 1 of the pre-use trademarks : LUMIE 2 of the pre-use trademarks 2 of the pre-use trademarks 1 of the trademark: both initials and initials

C. On April 21, 2016, the Defendant falls under Article 7(1)12 of the former Trademark Act (amended by Act No. 1403, Feb. 29, 2016; hereinafter “former Trademark Act”) and registration thereof should be invalidated pursuant to Article 71(1) of the former Trademark Act, since the registered trademark of this case is used for unlawful purposes, which is similar to the pre-use trademarks recognized as indicating the goods of a specific person by domestic or foreign consumers at the date of application.

2) On September 23, 2016, the pre-use trademarks were known to the extent that at least domestic consumers indicate the Defendant’s goods at the time of the filing date of the instant registered trademark, and the registered trademark of this case is similar to the pre-use trademarks and its names, as a whole, to the extent that the registered trademark of this case is identical to the pre-use trademarks and its names.

In addition, this case.