The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of one year, two years of suspended execution, two years of protection, observation of protection, 40 hours of lectures for the prevention of sexual traffic, community service, 120 hours of additional collection, 50 million won of additional collection) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime.

However, the crime of this case is not likely to commit an act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes, and in particular, even though the defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime, he again committed the crime of this case.

In addition, the lower court’s sentencing is determined to be appropriate, and it does not seem unfair because it is too unreasonable, in light of the following circumstances, comprehensively takes account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the previous theory.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.