logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.07 2017고단4718
야간주거침입절도
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[criminal history] On April 13, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of ten months for special larceny, etc., and a short of six months for the same year at the Cheongju District Court Cheongju District Court 2012 (a consolidated 2012 high group 454)

8. 11. 확정되고, 2012. 9. 7. 청주지방법원에서 � 력행 위 등 처벌에 관한 법률위반( 공동 주거 침입) 죄 등으로 징역 단기 4월, 장기 6월을 선고 받아 그 판결이 같은 달 15. 확정되었으며, 2014. 11. 28. 청주지방법원에서 특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률위반( 절도) 죄로 징역 1년 6월을 선고 받아 그 판결이 같은 해 12. 6. 확정되었고, 2017. 4. 7. 인천지방법원에서 야간 건조물 침입 절도죄로 징역 8월을 선고 받아 그 판결이 같은 해

6.9. It is final and conclusive person.

[2] On February 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 03:15 on February 25, 2012, when the victim D uses it as a residence; (b) when the victim D uses it as a residence; (c) opened the door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door up, and then cut the above door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door and door kh door up to the Defendant’s 80,000 won.

Accordingly, the Defendant abused the victim's property in a total of 712,500 won due to intrusion upon residence at night.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. Report on investigation (related to the results of fingerprint identification and response to the suspect);

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, reporting on the results of confirmation of the previous convictions of dispositions, investigation reports (related to concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act), investigation reports, each judgment, and the screen of inquiries into integrated cases, shall be applied to the law.

arrow