1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The court's reasoning for this case is as follows: (a) Nos. 4, 15, and 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) Nos. 4, 15, and 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance, considering the following as a whole: (a) the prosecutor's office conducted a loan under the name of the plaintiff, and (b) the defendant's employee, F, etc. stated that the plaintiff would have granted the right of representation to prepare the No. 3 of the No. 3 of the No. 4 of the loan agreement of this case if the plaintiff requested the plaintiff's seal imprint due to lack of documents preparation; and (c) the seal appraisal result (Evidence No. 9) of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office's seal impression that the seal imprint portion of the loan agreement of this case is not the same as that of the plaintiff's seal imprint is insufficient to reverse the above fact-finding; and (d) the loan agreement of this case does not constitute a loan agreement."

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.