Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2014, at around 23:28, the Defendant: (a) discovered otobane operated by the victim E (the 16-year-old age) who passed the above location on the street, located in Sag Chang-gun C; and (b) caused the victim to go beyond the upper part of the victim’s otobbbb, thereby causing the victim to go beyond the upper part of the victim’s front part of the odtob, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Attachment of a medical certificate);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant suffered bodily injury by being injured by the plaintiff's presumed students of the Republic of Korea, which he had been operated by G, and that there is no lebioba.

2. However, in full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim due to the occurrence of the victim’s stobane may be sufficiently recognized.

Contrary to this, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is not accepted. ① The victim and G on the Obaba from the police to the police's investigation, and the defendant's specific and consistent statement about the process and appearance of Obaba from the time when they were investigated to the court, and their statements are relatively consistent and credibility in each statement.

② Even if the Defendant’s police statement is based on the Defendant’s police statement (inception page 31), the victim resisted the Defendant from the day immediately after the victim suffered an injury over the stoba, and the F at the latest site was operated by E.